"Both are equally immoral," observed one of the guests, "for they both have the same object - to take away life. The State is not God. It has not the right to take away what it cannot restore when it wants to."
Among the guests was a young lawyer, a young man of five-and-twenty. When he was asked his opinion, he said:
"The death sentence and the life sentence are equally immoral, but if I had to choose between the death penalty and imprisonment for life, I would certainly choose the second. To live anyhow is better than not at all."
A lively discussion arose. The banker, who was younger and more nervous in those days, was suddenly carried away by excitement; he struck the table with his fist and shouted at the young man:
"It's not true! I'll bet you two million you wouldn't stay in solitary confinement for five years."
"If you mean that in earnest," said the young man, "I'll take the bet, but I would stay not five but fifteen years."
"Fifteen? Done!" cried the banker. "Gentlemen, I stake two million!"
"Agreed! You stake your millions and I stake my freedom!" said the young man.
And this wild, senseless bet was carried out! The banker, spoilt and frivolous, with millions beyond his reckoning, was delighted at the bet. At supper he made fun of the young man, and said:
"Think better of it, young man, while there is still time. To me two million is a trifle, but you are losing three or four of the best years of your life. I say three or four, because you won't stay longer. Don't forget either, you unhappy man, that voluntary confinement is a great deal harder to bear than compulsory. The thought that you have the right to step out in liberty at any moment will poison your whole existence in prison. I am sorry for you."
And now the banker, walking to and fro, remembered all this, and asked himself: "What was the object of that bet? What is the good of that man's losing fifteen years of his life and my throwing away two million? Can it prove that the death penalty is better or worse than imprisonment for life? No, no. It was all nonsensical and meaningless. On my part it was the caprice of a pampered man, and on his part simple greed for money ..."
Then he remembered what followed that evening. It was decided that the young man should spend the years of his captivity under the strictest supervision in one of the lodges in the banker's garden. It was agreed that for fifteen years he should not be free to cross the threshold of the lodge, to see human beings, to hear the human voice, or to receive letters and newspapers. He was allowed to have a musical instrument and books, and was allowed to write letters, to drink wine, and to smoke. By the terms of the agreement, the only relations he could have with the outer world were by a little window made purposely for that object. He might have anything he wanted - books, music, wine, and so on - in any quantity he desired by writing an order, but could only receive them through the window. The agreement provided for every detail and every trifle that would make his imprisonment strictly solitary, and bound the young man to stay there exactly fifteen years, beginning from twelve o'clock of November 14, 1870, and ending at twelve o'clock of November 14, 1885. The slightest attempt on his part to break the conditions, if only two minutes before the end, released the banker from the obligation to pay him the two million.
For the first year of his confinement, as far as one could judge from his brief notes, the prisoner suffered severely from loneliness and depression. The sounds of the piano could be heard continually day and night from his lodge. He refused wine and tobacco. Wine, he wrote, excites the desires, and desires are the worst foes of the prisoner; and besides, nothing could be more dreary than drinking good wine and seeing no one. And tobacco spoilt the air of his room. In the first year the books he sent for were principally of a light character; novels with a complicated love plot, sensational and fantastic stories, and so on.
In the second year the piano was silent in the lodge, and the prisoner asked only for the classics. In the fifth year music was audible again, and the prisoner asked for wine. Those who watched him through the window said that all that year he spent doing nothing but eating and drinking and lying on his bed, frequently yawning and angrily talking to himself. He did not read books. Sometimes at night he would sit down to write; he would spend hours writing, and in the morning tear up all that he had written. More than once he could be heard crying.
In the second half of the sixth year the prisoner began zealously studying languages, philosophy, and history. He threw himself eagerly into these studies - so much so that the banker had enough to do to get him the books he ordered. In the course of four years some six hundred volumes were procured at his request. It was during this period that the banker received the following letter from his prisoner:
"My dear Jailer, I write you these lines in six languages. Show them to people who know the languages. Let them read them. If they find not one mistake I implore you to fire a shot in the garden. That shot will show me that my efforts have not been thrown away. The geniuses of all ages and of all lands speak different languages, but the same flame burns in them all. Oh, if you only knew what unearthly happiness my soul feels now from being able to understand them!" The prisoner's desire was fulfilled. The banker ordered two shots to be fired in the garden.
Then after the tenth year, the prisoner sat immovably at the table and read nothing but the Gospel. It seemed strange to the banker that a man who in four years had mastered six hundred learned volumes should waste nearly a year over one thin book easy of comprehension. Theology and histories of religion followed the Gospels.
In the last two years of his confinement the prisoner read an immense quantity of books quite indiscriminately. At one time he was busy with the natural sciences, then he would ask for Byron or Shakespeare. There were notes in which he demanded at the same time books on chemistry, and a manual of medicine, and a novel, and some treatise on philosophy or theology. His reading suggested a man swimming in the sea among the wreckage of his ship, and trying to save his life by greedily clutching first at one spar and then at another.
The old banker remembered all this, and thought:
"To-morrow at twelve o'clock he will regain his freedom. By our agreement I ought to pay him two million. If I do pay him, it is all over with me: I shall be utterly ruined."
Fifteen years before, his millions had been beyond his reckoning; now he was afraid to ask himself which were greater, his debts or his assets. Desperate gambling on the Stock Exchange, wild speculation and the excitability whic h he could not get over even in advancing years, had by degrees led to the decline of his fortune and the proud, fearless, self-confident millionaire had become a banker of middling rank, trembling at every rise and fall in his investments. "Cursed bet!" muttered the old man, clutching his head in despair "Why didn't the man die? He is only forty now. He will take my last penny from me, he will marry, will enjoy life, will gamble on the Exchange; while I shall look at him with envy like a beggar, and hear from him every day the same sentence: 'I am indebted to you for the happiness of my life, let me help you!' No, it is too much! The one means of being saved from bankruptcy and disgrace is the death of that man!"
It struck three o'clock, the banker listened; everyone was asleep in the house and nothing could be heard outside but the rustling of the chilled trees. Trying to make no noise, he took from a fireproof safe the key of the door which had not been opened for fifteen years, put on his overcoat, and went out of the house.
It was dark and cold in the garden. Rain was falling. A damp cutting wind was racing about the garden, howling and giving the trees no rest. The banker strained his eyes, but could see neither the earth nor the white statues, nor the lodge, nor the trees. Going to the spot where the lodge stood, he twice called the watchman. No answer followed. Evidently the watchman had sought shelter from the weather, and was now asleep somewhere either in the kitchen or in the greenhouse.
"If I had the pluck to carry out my intention," thought the old man, "Suspicion would fall first upon the watchman."
He felt in the darkness for the steps and the door, and went into the entry of the lodge. Then he groped his way into a little passage and lighted a match. There was not a soul there. There was a bedstead with no bedding on it, and in the corner there was a dark cast-iron stove. The seals on the door leading to the prisoner's rooms were intact.
When the match went out the old man, trembling with emotion, peeped through the little window. A candle was burning dimly in the prisoner's room. He was sitting at the table. Nothing could be seen but his back, the hair on his head, and his hands. Open books were lying on the table, on the two easy-chairs, and on the carpet near the table.
Five minutes passed and the prisoner did not once stir. Fifteen years' imprisonment had taught him to sit still. The banker tapped at the window with his finger, and the prisoner made no movement whatever in response. Then the banker cautiously broke the seals off the door and put the key in the keyhole. The rusty lock gave a grating sound and the door creaked. The banker expected to hear at once footsteps and a cry of astonishment, but three minutes passed and it was as quiet as ever in the room. He made up his mind to go in.
At the table a man unlike ordinary people was sitting motionless. He was a skeleton with the skin drawn tight over his bones, with long curls like a woman's and a shaggy beard. His face was yellow with an earthy tint in it, his cheeks were hollow, his back long and narrow, and the hand on which his shaggy head was propped was so thin and delicate that it was dreadful to look at it. His hair was already streaked with silver, and seeing his emaciated, aged-looking face, no one would have believed that he was only forty. He was asleep ... In front of his bowed head there lay on the table a sheet of paper on which there was something written in fine handwriting.
Summary of “The Bet” by Anton Chekhov
Anton Chekhov’s short story The Bet explores human values, materialism, and the meaning of life through a unique wager between a banker and a young lawyer.
The story begins at a dinner party where guests discuss capital punishment versus life imprisonment. The banker asserts that the death penalty is more humane than life in prison, as prolonged confinement is worse than death. In contrast, the young lawyer argues that life, under any circumstances, is better than death. Their disagreement escalates into a heated argument, leading the banker to impulsively wager two million rubles that the lawyer could not endure fifteen years of voluntary solitary confinement. The lawyer accepts, agreeing to live in a lodge on the banker’s estate with no human contact, though he may have books, music, wine, and writing materials.
During the first years, the lawyer immerses himself in reading light novels, playing the piano, and drinking. Gradually, he shifts toward serious study, reading languages, philosophy, history, and theology. Over the years, he learns multiple languages, reads hundreds of books, and contemplates human knowledge and spirituality. His intellectual journey transforms him, moving him away from material desires toward a search for truth and meaning.
Meanwhile, the banker’s fortunes decline. By the final year of the bet, he has lost much of his wealth and fears he cannot pay the promised two million rubles. Desperate, he resolves to kill the lawyer to avoid financial ruin. However, when he sneaks into the lodge, he discovers a letter in which the lawyer renounces the bet. In the letter, the lawyer declares that he despises material wealth and worldly pleasures, considering them worthless illusions. He has found contentment in spiritual knowledge and detachment. To prove his sincerity, he plans to leave the lodge five hours before the fifteen years expire, thereby forfeiting the money.
The banker leaves in silence, feeling a mix of relief and shame. The lawyer departs as planned, disappearing into the night, leaving behind his possessions and the two million rubles.
Through this ironic ending, Chekhov highlights the futility of materialism and the profound transformation that isolation and reflection can bring. The story questions the true value of life’s pursuits and suggests that wisdom lies beyond wealth and worldly success.
"Poor creature!" thought the banker, "he is asleep and most likely dreaming of the millions. And I have only to take this half-dead man, throw him on the bed, stifle him a little with the pillow, and the most conscientious expert would find no sign of a violent death. But let us first read what he has written here ... "
The banker took the page from the table and read as follows:
"To-morrow at twelve o'clock I regain my freedom and the right to associate with other men, but before I leave this room and see the sunshine, I think it necessary to say a few words to you. With a clear conscience I tell you, as before God, who beholds me, that I despise freedom and life and health, and all that in your books is called the good things of the world.
"For fifteen years I have been intently studying earthly life. It is true I have not seen the earth nor men, but in your books I have drunk fragrant wine, I have sung songs, I have hunted stags and wild boars in the forests, have loved women ... Beauties as ethereal as clouds, created by the magic of your poets and geniuses, have visited me at night, and have whispered in my ears wonderful tales that have set my brain in a whirl. In your books I have climbed to the peaks of Elburz and Mont Blanc, and from there I have seen the sun rise and have watched it at evening flood the sky, the ocean, and the mountain-tops with gold and crimson. I have watched from there the lightning flashing over my head and cleaving the storm-clouds. I have seen green forests, fields, rivers, lakes, towns. I have heard the singing of the sirens, and the strains of the shepherds' pipes; I have touched the wings of comely devils who flew down to converse with me of God ... In your books I have flung myself into the bottomless pit, performed miracles, slain, burned towns, preached new religions, conquered whole kingdoms ...
"Your books have given me wisdom. All that the unresting thought of man has created in the ages is compressed into a small compass in my brain. I know that I am wiser than all of you.
"And I despise your books, I despise wisdom and the blessings of this world. It is all worthless, fleeting, illusory, and deceptive, like a mirage. You may be proud, wise, and fine, but death will wipe you off the face of the earth as though you were no more than mice burrowing under the floor, and your posterity, your history, your immortal geniuses will burn or freeze together with the earthly globe.
"You have lost your reason and taken the wrong path. You have taken lies for truth, and hideousness for beauty. You would marvel if, owing to strange events of some sorts, frogs and lizards suddenly grew on apple and orange trees instead of fruit, or if roses began to smell like a sweating horse; so I marvel at you who exchange heaven for earth. I don't want to understand you.
"To prove to you in action how I despise all that you live by, I renounce the two million of which I once dreamed as of paradise and which now I despise. To deprive myself of the right to the money I shall go out from here five hours before the time fixed, and so break the compact ..."
When the banker had read this he laid the page on the table, kissed the strange man on the head, and went out of the lodge, weeping. At no other time, even when he had lost heavily on the Stock Exchange, had he felt so great a contempt for himself. When he got home he lay on his bed, but his tears and emotion kept him for hours from sleeping.
Next morning the watchmen ran in with pale faces, and told him they had seen the man who lived in the lodge climb out of the window into the garden, go to the gate, and disappear. The banker went at once with the servants to the lodge and made sure of the flight of his prisoner. To avoid arousing unnecessary talk, he took from the table the writing in which the millions were renounced, and when he got home locked it up in the fireproof safe.
Compact Summary of The Bet in 100 words
At a party, a banker and a young lawyer debate whether death or life imprisonment is better. The banker wagers two million rubles that the lawyer cannot endure fifteen years of voluntary solitary confinement. The lawyer accepts and spends the years reading, studying, and reflecting, eventually rejecting material wealth and worldly pleasures. As the banker’s fortune declines, he plans to kill the lawyer to avoid paying. However, the lawyer renounces the bet in writing and leaves early, forfeiting the money. The banker is left ashamed, and the story underscores the emptiness of materialism and the transformative power of knowledge.
MCQs — The Bet
1. What is the main topic of discussion at the beginning of the story?
a) Value of money
b) Death penalty vs. life imprisonment
c) Importance of solitude
d) Justice system reforms
Answer: b) Death penalty vs. life imprisonment
2. Who argues that the death penalty is more humane?
a) The lawyer
b) The banker
c) A guest
d) Chekhov himself
Answer: b) The banker
3. How long was the confinement period agreed upon in the bet?
a) 10 years
b) 12 years
c) 15 years
d) 20 years
Answer: c) 15 years
4. What was the wager amount?
a) One million rubles
b) Two million rubles
c) Five million rubles
d) Ten million rubles
Answer: b) Two million rubles
5. Where did the lawyer spend his confinement?
a) A prison cell
b) A lodge in the banker’s garden
c) A remote island house
d) A locked basement
Answer: b) A lodge in the banker’s garden
6. What was the lawyer not allowed during confinement?
a) Books
b) Music
c) Human contact
d) Wine
Answer: c) Human contact
7. How did the lawyer spend his first year?
a) Reading theology
b) Playing piano and reading light novels
c) Studying languages
d) Writing letters to friends
Answer: b) Playing piano and reading light novels
8. What shift occurs in the lawyer’s reading habits over time?
a) From fiction to serious study
b) From poetry to short stories
c) From history to music
d) From study to entertainment
Answer: a) From fiction to serious study
9. Which subjects did the lawyer study?
a) Only philosophy
b) Languages, history, philosophy, theology
c) Only law books
d) Medicine and science
Answer: b) Languages, history, philosophy, theology
10. How many languages did the lawyer master?
a) 3
b) 4
c) 5
d) 6
Answer: c) 6
11. What happened to the banker’s fortune over the years?
a) It increased
b) It remained the same
c) It declined sharply
d) It doubled
Answer: c) It declined sharply
12. Why did the banker plan to kill the lawyer?
a) Out of revenge
b) To avoid paying the bet money
c) Because the lawyer insulted him
d) To stop the lawyer’s studies
Answer: b) To avoid paying the bet money
13. What did the banker find in the lawyer’s lodge near the end?
a) A suicide note
b) A confession letter renouncing the money
c) A pile of books
d) A will
Answer: b) A confession letter renouncing the money
14. How many hours before the agreed time did the lawyer leave?
a) One hour
b) Five hours
c) Ten hours
d) Twelve hours
Answer: b) Five hours
15. Why did the lawyer renounce the bet?
a) He hated the banker
b) He despised money and worldly pleasures
c) He was too tired to continue
d) He was offered a better deal
Answer: b) He despised money and worldly pleasures
16. What did the banker feel after reading the lawyer’s letter?
a) Anger
b) Relief and shame
c) Triumph
d) Indifference
Answer: b) Relief and shame
17. Which literary device is most evident in the ending?
a) Metaphor
b) Foreshadowing
c) Irony
d) Hyperbole
Answer: c) Irony
18. What theme is central to the story?
a) War and peace
b) Greed vs. wisdom
c) Romantic love
d) Social justice
Answer: b) Greed vs. wisdom
19. Who “wins” the bet in a material sense?
a) The lawyer
b) The banker
c) Both
d) Neither
Answer: b) The banker
20. Who “wins” the bet in a moral sense?
a) The lawyer
b) The banker
c) Both
d) Neither
Answer: a) The lawyer
Exam Question Set-- The Bet
A. Short-Answer Questions (2–3 marks each)
1 . Why does the banker consider the death penalty more humane than life imprisonment?
Answer: The banker believes that death is quicker and less cruel, while life imprisonment prolongs suffering over many years.
2. What was the lawyer allowed to have during his confinement?
Answer: He was allowed books, music, wine, and writing materials, but no human contact.
3. How long was the lawyer supposed to remain in solitary confinement?
Answer: Fifteen years.
4. Why does the banker plan to kill the lawyer in the final year?
Answer: The banker has lost much of his fortune and fears financial ruin if he must pay the two million rubles.
B. Long-Answer Questions (5–6 marks each)
1. Describe the transformation of the lawyer during his confinement.
Answer: In the early years, the lawyer indulges in novels, music, and drinking. Gradually, he shifts to serious study, learning languages, reading philosophy, history, and theology. Over time, he becomes spiritually detached, rejecting material desires. In the end, he renounces the money, considering worldly pleasures meaningless, and leaves confinement early, achieving moral victory over the banker.
2. Explain how Chekhov uses irony in the ending of The Bet.
Answer: Irony lies in the fact that the banker fears losing money, but the lawyer renounces the prize voluntarily, sparing him. The banker “wins” financially but suffers moral defeat, while the lawyer “loses” the bet but gains spiritual enlightenment, reversing their expected roles.
C. Analytical Questions (8–10 marks each)
1. Compare and contrast the characters of the banker and the lawyer, highlighting their changes over time.
Answer: Initially, the banker is wealthy, arrogant, and confident, while the lawyer is young, idealistic, and materialistically motivated. Over fifteen years, the banker’s fortunes decline and his moral weakness emerges when he considers murder to avoid payment. The lawyer, on the other hand, grows intellectually and spiritually, ultimately rejecting wealth as meaningless. By the end, the banker is ashamed despite keeping his money, and the lawyer is morally superior despite forfeiting the prize.
2. Discuss the theme of materialism versus spiritual fulfillment in The Bet.
Answer: Chekhov contrasts the banker’s greed and fear of financial loss with the lawyer’s gradual rejection of material wealth. The lawyer’s transformation through study and reflection leads him to see worldly pleasures as empty illusions. The banker’s clinging to money leaves him morally bankrupt. The story suggests that true fulfillment lies in knowledge and spiritual understanding, not in material possessions.
Character Sketch of the Young Lawyer
The Young Lawyer in Chekhov’s “The Bet” is a central figure whose life becomes an embodiment of youthful passion, intellectual curiosity, and eventual spiritual awakening. At the beginning of the story, he is a man in his mid-twenties, full of enthusiasm, pride, and the fiery spirit of youth. He strongly believes that any life—even behind bars—is better than no life at all, and it is this conviction that leads him to accept the banker’s seemingly impossible challenge of spending fifteen years in solitary confinement.
Chekhov presents him as bold, idealistic, and somewhat impulsive. Unlike the banker, who is older and more practical, the young lawyer’s decision springs not from calculation but from a desire to prove his belief and perhaps win fame and fortune. His acceptance of the bet reflects his strong will and determination, qualities that sustain him through the long years of isolation.
During his confinement, his character undergoes a profound transformation. Initially, he spends his days in music and light reading, but gradually he turns to serious studies—languages, philosophy, literature, and theology. This shows his thirst for knowledge and a restless search for truth. His intellectual journey reflects not only discipline but also an ever-growing dissatisfaction with the material world.
By the end of fifteen years, the young lawyer emerges spiritually reborn. He rejects wealth, luxury, and the vanities of human society, declaring them meaningless illusions. In his letter, he renounces the very prize he had once hoped to win, choosing instead a life free from worldly desires. This renunciation reveals his evolution from an ambitious, passionate youth into a wise, almost ascetic philosopher who values truth and spiritual freedom above all.
Thus, the young lawyer is not a static character; he is dynamic and deeply symbolic. His journey from fiery idealism to spiritual enlightenment mirrors humanity’s eternal quest for meaning. Chekhov uses him to show how suffering, solitude, and study can strip away illusions and lead to higher wisdom.
Character Sketch of the Banker
The Banker in Anton Chekhov’s short story “The Bet” is an important character who serves as a foil to the young lawyer. At the beginning of the tale, he is a rich, self-confident man in his forties. His wealth gives him a sense of authority and pride, and he believes firmly in the power of money and worldly pleasures. When the debate about capital punishment versus life imprisonment arises, he takes a practical and somewhat cynical view. To him, death is preferable to lifelong confinement, for he equates life’s worth with the enjoyment of freedom, wealth, and luxury.
Confident in his riches, the banker recklessly offers two million rubles to anyone who can endure solitary imprisonment for fifteen years. This extravagant wager reflects not only his arrogance but also his materialistic outlook. He does not think deeply about the moral or human implications of such a bet; instead, he views it as entertainment and a test of superiority.
As the years pass, however, the banker’s character begins to change. His wealth declines because of reckless speculation and poor financial decisions, leaving him anxious and insecure. The once proud, powerful man now trembles at the thought of losing his remaining fortune. His selfishness and moral weakness are revealed most starkly when he contemplates murdering the young lawyer to escape paying the promised sum. This dark moment exposes his greed and moral bankruptcy.
In contrast to the lawyer, who grows spiritually and intellectually during the years of isolation, the banker remains stagnant, even regressive. He does not seek higher truths or moral values but clings desperately to money and status. At the end of the story, when the lawyer renounces the prize, the banker feels relieved but also deeply ashamed. He realizes his own moral failure but lacks the strength to transform himself.
Thus, the banker is portrayed as a symbol of materialism, greed, and human weakness. While the young lawyer rises above worldly desires, the banker falls into spiritual emptiness. Chekhov uses him to highlight the corrupting power of wealth and the tragic decline of a man who allows materialism to dominate his life.
Comments
Post a Comment